▶️ read the original article by GroundUp – click here
As reported by GroundUp’s Masego Mafata, Daniel Steyn and Raymond Joseph, sewing cooperatives have been left unpaid for thousands of uniforms they supplied to the Gauteng Department of Social Development for disadvantaged learners.
The department attributes this to the cooperatives being wrongly appointed by officials and claims a separate tender exists for school uniforms. However, tension escalated when a dozen cooperative members occupied the department’s offices on Monday night, May 6th, demanding payment. Despite negotiations, they were eventually removed by police, sparking a continued protest outside the building.
These cooperatives, crucial for providing free uniforms to needy students, are financially distressed due to delayed payments. The department’s explanation of irregular appointments and ongoing investigations does little to alleviate their plight. Former department head Matilda Gasela’s memo, dated March 26th, highlights the existence of irregularities within the program, questioning the accountability of officials.
Members of these cooperatives express frustration over mounting debts incurred to fulfil orders, with some resorting to borrowing substantial sums. This delay in payment disrupts their livelihoods, affecting their ability to support themselves and their communities. For instance, one member, Maria, shares her struggle of borrowing funds to cover expenses, which undermines the financial stability of her cooperative and its employees.
Furthermore, changes in the procurement system, including subcontracting through main contractors, exacerbate the issue. Co-op members report signing documents without clarity or assurance of payment, exacerbating their vulnerability to exploitation. Additionally, delayed payments jeopardize their ability to sustain their operations, risking loss of premises and livelihoods for many.
The emotional toll of this situation is palpable, as demonstrated by members breaking down in tears at the department’s offices on Tuesday, May 7th, over the loss of their workspace. Their testimonies underscore the human cost of bureaucratic inefficiency and negligence. Moreover, suspicions regarding the legitimacy of main contractors raise concerns about possible corruption within the procurement process.
From a social justice perspective, this scenario epitomizes systemic injustice, where marginalized individuals are exploited and denied their rightful earnings. The delay in payment perpetuates cycles of poverty, disproportionately affecting working-class communities reliant on such cooperatives. The department’s failure to prioritize these payments reflects a disregard for the well-being of its most vulnerable constituents.
In essence, the plight of these sewing cooperatives epitomizes broader issues of economic inequality and institutional neglect. Urgent action is needed to address their grievances, ensuring fair compensation and sustainable support mechanisms. Only through accountability and equitable practices can true social justice be achieved for all members of society, especially those on the margins.
